Buy AI or Build It?

A $300 million logistics company spent 18 months building an AI system for customs clearance. They hired three ML engineers, built a promising prototype, and invested nearly $1 million. The system never went live.

The failure wasn’t about the model. It was everything around it: it couldn’t integrate with their legacy TMS, data quality issues surfaced after six months, models required constant retraining, and two engineers left. After 18 months, the project was shut down. Not a single customs entry ever ran in production.

The most painful part? Every problem they tried to solve already has commercial off-the-shelf solutions built by logistics AI vendors.

This isn’t an isolated story. It’s a pattern—one forcing logistics operators across freight forwarding, 3PL, trucking, warehousing, and supply chain management to confront a major technology decision: should you buy AI or build it yourself?

The Data Is Unambiguous

MIT’s State of AI in Business 2025 report analyzed more than 300 deployments:

• 67% success rate when companies buy AI
• 33% success rate when they build

McKinsey’s 2025 research reinforces the story:

• 88% of companies now use AI
• Only one-third scale beyond pilots
• Just 6% achieve true operational transformation
• Only 39% see measurable EBIT improvement

Across the economy, companies have invested $30–40 billion in AI initiatives—yet 95% of pilots still fail. AI works; most implementation strategies do not.

Why “Build” Fails in Logistics

The logistics sector amplifies every challenge involved in custom AI development—regardless of whether you run a freight forwarding operation, a warehouse, a trucking fleet, or a 3PL.

Scarce AI Talent With Logistics Expertise

Finding ML engineers is difficult. Finding ML engineers who understand customs rules, WMS workflows, drayage pricing, accessorials, appointment scheduling, HS codes, damage claims, or retailer compliance is nearly impossible. This leads to technically strong models that fail in real operations.

Model Accuracy Gap

Open-source models lag logistics-specific AI by around 5%. At scale, that 5% translates into costly exceptions—incorrect data capture, failed validations, misclassifications, and manual rework.

Integration Complexity

Logistics tech stacks are notoriously fragmented: TMS, WMS, ERP, customs systems, carrier portals, telematics, ELDs, email, WhatsApp, PDFs, spreadsheets. Nothing is unified.

A mid-sized operator estimated three months for TMS integration. The reality was closer to nine—and that was just one system.

Continuous Maintenance

Regulations change. Retailer routing guides get updated. Carrier surcharges shift. Document formats evolve. Every change requires retraining and quality checks. Internal teams rarely keep pace.

Together, these factors cause internal AI tools to remain permanently stuck in “beta,” never delivering stable operational value.

Why Mid-Market Logistics Companies Are Winning

MIT’s research found that mid-market operators often outperform enterprises—not due to bigger budgets, but because they move faster. They avoid:

• Legacy systems that block integration
• Procurement cycles that stretch to 12–18 months
• IT teams optimised for stability instead of speed

Top performers reached production in around 90 days by targeting clear pain points, using ready-made logistics AI, and measuring outcomes rather than technical milestones.

When Buying AI Makes Sense (Most of the Time)

Commercial logistics AI platforms offer advantages that internal teams struggle to replicate:

Pre-Trained Logistics Models

Models already understand freight documents, warehouse forms, customs entries, BOLs, invoices, truck dispatch data, SKU-level inventory data, and compliance requirements.

Built-In Integrations

CargoWise, Descartes, SAP, Manhattan, Blue Yonder, warehouse systems, TMS/WMS/ERP—already solved.

Continuous Improvement

When rules change or new formats appear, commercial providers update models for all customers.

ROI-Driven Delivery

Vendors focus on outcomes: faster processing, fewer errors, higher throughput, improved service levels.

One retail logistics provider achieved 67% faster processing, 99.8% compliance, and 3.5x volume with the same team—plus $85k in reduced chargebacks.

When Building Makes Sense (Rare Cases)

Building is appropriate only when:

• You operate in highly regulated or classified environments
• Your workflows are truly unique or proprietary (e.g., patented warehouse automation flows)
• You have permanent senior AI and ML talent
• No commercial solution exists for your use case

These situations are rare across trucking, warehousing, customs brokerage, retail logistics, and 3PL operations.

The Real Decision: 18 Months vs. 90 Days

The choice is simple:

Build

18 months of development, $1m–$4m in cost, 33% success rate, heavy maintenance burden, full responsibility for compliance and model performance.

Buy

60–90 days to production, 67% success rate, pre-built integrations, continuous updates, vendor accountability.

Competitors who buy AI are already automating quotes, customs entries, bookings, invoices, warehouse documents, POD capture, and inbox triage. They’re handling three times the volume with the same headcount and replying to customers in seconds instead of minutes.

McKinsey shows that only 39% of companies see EBIT uplift from AI—but they’re the ones who deploy quickly.

A Practical Framework for Logistics Leaders

Default to buy unless:

• You operate in a genuinely unique regulatory environment
• Your workflows are patented
• You have permanent senior AI talent
• No commercial solution exists

Run a 30-day pilot. Measure speed, accuracy, and integration. If it works, scale. If not, evaluate building.

Track outcomes like cost per transaction, processing time, error rates, and capacity gains—not vanity metrics like “AI adoption.”

Bottom Line

The logistics industry faces a pivotal decision: build custom AI or deploy proven, purpose-built logistics AI. Evidence shows that companies who buy AI succeed twice as often, reach production in 90 days, and achieve measurable operational ROI. Companies who build often spend 18 months with nothing in production.

Your competitors aren’t debating AI strategy – they’re already automating. The real question isn’t “build or buy?” It’s “how fast can we deploy?”

About Ripple

Ripple provides purpose-built AI automation for logistics operations across freight forwarding, 3PL, trucking, customs brokerage, warehousing, and supply chain. Our customers achieve 67–92% faster processing times, handle 3–3.5x the volume with existing teams, and reach 99.8% accuracy rates.

Contact: jonny@useripple.io | useripple.io

‍